Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2021; 13(2): 119-130
Published online Feb 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i2.119
Published online Feb 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i2.119
Standard therapy during CRT | TNT | P value | |
Patients who received CRT | 72 (100) | 88 (99) | 0.2751 |
Patients who received RT | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | |
Full-dose ChT (CAP or 5-FU + LV) | 62 (86) | 67 (75) | 0.087 |
Modification of concomitant ChT | 10 (14) | 22 (25) | |
Modification of RT | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | |
During adjuvant ChT | During systemic ChT | ||
Without ChT due to pCR | 5 (7) | 0 (0) | |
Patients who received ChT | 50 (72) | 89 (100) | |
All planned cycle | |||
6c of systemic ChT (CAP or CAPOX) | 34 (68) | 76 (85) | 0.0481 |
Other alternative schemes | 4 (8) | 2 (2) | |
No | 12 (24) | 11 (12) | |
Full-dose | |||
6c of systemic ChT (CAP or CAPOX) | 25 (50) | 56 (63) | 0.1581 |
Other alternative schemes | 4 (8) | 2 (2) | |
No | 21 (42) | 31 (35) |
- Citation: Tuta M, Boc N, Brecelj E, Peternel M, Velenik V. Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13(2): 119-130
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v13/i2/119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i2.119