Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2021; 13(12): 2161-2179
Published online Dec 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.2161
Published online Dec 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.2161
Table 1 Criteria of five tumor regression grading systems
TRG system | Description |
JGCA/JGCA2017-TRG | |
0 | No response |
1a | 67%-99% residual tumor/tumor bed |
1b | 34%-66% residual tumor/tumor bed |
2/2a | 10%-33% residual tumor/tumor bed |
/2b | < 10% residual tumor/tumor bed |
3 | Complete response |
Becker-TRG | |
1a | Complete response |
1b | < 10% residual tumor/tumor bed |
2 | 10%-50% residual tumor/tumor bed |
3 | > 50% residual tumor/tumor bed |
AJCC/CAP-TRG | |
0 | No residual tumor |
1 | Single cells or rare small groups of cancer cells |
2 | More than single cells or rare small groups of cancer cells with evident tumor regression |
3 | Extensive residual tumor or no response |
Mandard-TRG | |
1 | No residual tumor |
2 | Rare residual tumor |
3 | Fibrosis outgrowing residual tumor |
4 | Residual tumor outgrowing fibrosis |
5 | No response |
- Citation: Liu ZN, Wang YK, Zhang L, Jia YN, Fei S, Ying XJ, Zhang Y, Li SX, Sun Y, Li ZY, Ji JF. Comparison of tumor regression grading systems for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13(12): 2161-2179
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v13/i12/2161.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.2161