Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2021; 13(11): 1599-1615
Published online Nov 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i11.1599
Table 2 Some representative studies of deep learning in hepatocellular carcinoma
Ref.
Application task
Study design
Imaging modality
Algorithm
Sample size
Training set
Test/validation set
Performance
Bousabarah et al[91], 2021Automatic detection and segmentation of HCCRetrospective, single-centerCTDCNN, U-net174 patients with 231 lesions16533 (test); 33 (validation)Mean DSC between automatically detected lesions using the DCNN + RF + TR and corresponding manual segmentations: 0.64/0.68 (validation/test), and 0.91/0.91 for liver segmentations
Yasaka et al[92], 2018Differentiation of HCC and other liver tumorsRetrospective, single-centerCTCNN560 patients460100Accuracy: 84% in test set
Hamm et al[93], 2019Diagnosis and classification of HCCRetrospective, single-centerMRICNN494 patients 43460Accuracy: 92%, AUC: 0.992
Yamashita et al[95], 2020Diagnosis and categorization of HCC with LI-RADS Retrospective, multi-centerCT, MRICNN314 patients (163 CT, 151 MRI)22047 (test); 47 (internal validation); 112 (external validation)Overall accuracy: 60.4% and AUCs: 0.85, 0.90, 0.63, and 0.82 for LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, and LR-5, respectively
Wang et al[96], 2020Preoperative prediction of MVI in HCCRetrospective, single-centerMRICNN97 patients with 100 HCCs60 HCCs40 HCCsThe combination of deep features from the b = 0, b = 100, b = 600, and ADC images presented the best results (AUC: 0.79)
Peng et al[97], 2020Prediction of treatment response of TACERetrospective, multi-center (3 institutions)CTResNet50789 patients with HCC562 (Institution 1)89 (Institution 2); 138 (Institution 3)Excellent predictive performance for CR, PR, SD, and PD (accuracy: 84.3%; AUCs: 0.97, 0.96, 0.95, and 0.96 in training set, accuracies: 85.1% and 82.8% in the two validation sets)
Zhang et al[98], 2020Predicting OS after TACE + SorafenibRetrospective, multi-center (3 institutions)CTDenseNet (CNN)201 patients with HCC120 (Institutions 1 and 2)81 (Institution 3)Favorable prediction performance (C-index: 0.717 in training set, C-index: 0.714 in validation set)
Tamada et al[99], 2020Motion artifact reductionRetrospective, single-centerMRICNN34 patients with HCC1420Significant reduction of the magnitude of the artifacts and blurring induced by respiratory motion
Esses et al[100], 2018Automated image quality evaluationRetrospective, single-centerMRICNN522 patients with HCC351171High negative predictive value (94% and 86% relative to two readers)