Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2020; 12(8): 918-930
Published online Aug 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.918
Published online Aug 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.918
Table 1 Comparison of baseline clinicopathological characteristics between the endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection groups
| All, n = 142 | EMR group, n = 87 | ESD group, n = 55 | P value | |
| Age, yr | ||||
| Median (IQR) | 63.5 (57-71.75) | 62 (57-70) | 66 (59-73.5) | 0.15 |
| Sex, n (%) | ||||
| Male | 79 (55.6) | 56 (64.4) | 23 (41.8) | 0.01 |
| Female | 63 (44.4) | 31 (35.6) | 32 (58.2) | |
| Tumor location, n (%) | ||||
| Bulbs | 32 (22.5) | 17 (19.5) | 15 (27.3) | 0.31 |
| Second portion or later | 110 (77.5) | 70 (80.5) | 40 (72.7) | |
| Morphology, n (%) | ||||
| Flat or depressed | 28 (19.7) | 17 (19.5) | 11 (20.0) | 1 |
| Protruded | 114 (80.3) | 70 (80.5) | 44 (80.0) | |
| Tumor size, mm | ||||
| Median (IQR) | 8 (5.25-15) | 7 (5-10) | 15 (10.5-20) | < 0.001 |
| < 11 mm | 85 (59.9) | 71 (81.6) | 14 (25.5) | < 0.001 |
| ≥ 11 mm | 57 (40.1) | 16 (18.4) | 41 (74.5) | |
| Tumor depth, n (%) | ||||
| Mucosa | 139 (97.9) | 86 (98.9) | 53 (96.4) | 0.56 |
| Submucosa | 3 (2.1) | 1 (1.1) | 2 (3.6) | |
| Histology, n (%) | ||||
| Adenoma | 103 (72.5) | 72 (82.8) | 31 (56.4) | 0.001 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 39 (27.5) | 15 (17.2) | 24 (43.6) | |
- Citation: Esaki M, Haraguchi K, Akahoshi K, Tomoeda N, Aso A, Itaba S, Ogino H, Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Nakamura K, Kubokawa M, Harada N, Minoda Y, Suzuki S, Ihara E, Ogawa Y. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(8): 918-930
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i8/918.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.918