Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2020; 12(8): 808-832
Published online Aug 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.808
Table 4 Evolving tools and biomarkers which may help precise patient selection for adjuvant therapy and therapy personalization in early stage colon cancer
Biomarker/toolClinical significancePotential use and relevanceRef.
ctDNAPrognosticctDNA detection in the bloodstream after surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy provides direct evidence of residual micro-metastatic disease and correlates with a very high risk of cancer recurrence in resected stage II and III patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values are 48%, 100%, 100% and 91%, respectively. Reported studies suggest that ctDNA can potentially serve as a real time marker of adjuvant therapy efficacy in stage II and III patients.[110-115]
ImmunoscorePrognosticHigh immunoscore is associated with favorable prognosis in both stage II and III patients independent of patient T stage, N stage and microsatellite instability. High-risk stage II patients with high Immunoscore had similar time to recurrence compared with average risk stage II patients in a recent report.[118-122]
dMMRPrognostic and predictiveAssociated with favorable prognosis in stage II and possibly low-risk (IDEA defined) stage III patients. Predicts lack of benefit and possibly harm with 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy in both stage II and III patients.[124-137]
KRAS and BRAFV600E mutationPrognosticKRAS and BRAFV600E mutations have been reported to be associated with a worse prognosis in several large retrospective studies, in both stage II and III patients. dMMR status attenuates adverse prognostic impact of BRAFV600E mutation, possibly except in IDEA defined high-risk stage III CC.[133,137 -141]
Genomic profiling (Oncotype Dx Colon Cancer®)PrognosticPrognostic discrimination capacity is insufficient to guide therapy in routine clinical practice.[142-147]
PIK3CA mutationsPredictiveRetrospective analysis suggests an association between the use of aspirin and improved survival among the patients with mutated-PIK3CA colorectal cancer including stage I-III patients.[152]
CDX2 expressionPrognostic and predictiveRetrospective analysis suggested lack of CDX2 expression was associated with worse outcome in stage II and III CC. Lack of CDX2 expression appears to be predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II patients.[153]
CMSPrognosticCMS1 tumors have a good prognosis, the CMS4 tumors have a poor prognosis, and the CMS2 and CMS3 types have an intermediate prognosis. Not validated to guide therapy in routine clinical practice.[148-151]