Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2020; 12(8): 808-832
Published online Aug 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.808
Table 3 Landmark adjuvant trials in early stage colon cancer
Study (Reference)Study populationPatients (n)Experimental armControl armStudy result/Conclusion
Intergroup (INT) 0035[64]Stage II and III12965-FU bolus + Levamisole for 1 yr.Observation.Stage III: 5-FU/Levamisole reduced recurrence rate by 41% (P < 0.0001) and the death rate by 33% (P = 0.006). Stage II- No survival benefit with 5-FU/Levamisole. One year of 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy became the standard for stage III patients.
NSABP C-03[66]Duke stage B and C1081Bolus 5-FU plus LV for 1 yr.MOF for 1 year.5-yr DFS rates- 54% vs 66% in favor of 5-FU/LV, P = 0.0004. 5-yr OS rates - 66% vs 76% in favor of 5-FU/LV, P = 0.003.
IMPACT B2[77]Stage II1016Bolus 5-FU/LV for 6 mo.Observation.Pooled analysis of B2 CC in 5 randomized trials. No significant improvement in survival with the adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-yr EFS: 73% for controls and 76% for 5-FU + LV (HR, 0.83; 90%CI: 0.72-1.07). The 5-yr OS: 80% for controls and 82% for 5-FU + LV (HR, 0.86; 90%CI: 0.68-1.07).
Intergroup (INT) 0089[63]High-risk stage II and stage III3794(1) Low-dose LV plus 5-FU (Mayo Clinic regimen); (2) High-dose LV plus 5-FU (Roswell Park regimen); and (3) Low-dose LV plus Levamisole plus 5-FU. Each for 30-32 wk.Bolus 5-FU plus levamisole for 1 year.None among the 4 arms was statistically superior in terms of DFS or OS. Roswell park regimen was better tolerated than Mayo Clinic regimen in terms of diarrhea. 6 mo of 5-FU/LV replaced 12 mo of 5-FU/Levamisole as standard of care.
GERCOR C96.1[85,86]Stage II and stage III905Semimonthly infusional 5-FU/LV (de Gramont regimen). Duration- 24 vs 36 wk.Monthly bolus 5-FU /LV (Mayo Clinic regimen). Duration- 24 vs 36 wk.DFS and OS were not statistically different between treatment groups and treatment durations. Semimonthly infusional 5-FU/LV regimen had better toxicity profile and was adopted as the standard arm for the MOSAIC trial.
QUASAR[75]Stage I-III3239 (Colon stage II = 2291)5-FU/LV monthly bolus (Mayo clinic regimen) for 6 mo.Observation.3.6% (95%CI: 1.0–6.0) absolute improvement in 5-year OS with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II CC patients.
X-ACT trial[92]Stage III1987Capecitabine- 6 mo.5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen)- 6 mo.5-yr OS rates 71.4% with capecitabine vs 68.4% with 5-FU/LV (P = 0.06). Capecitabine was at least equivalent to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS and DFS.
MOSAIC[53,76]High-risk Stage II and stage III2246FOLFOX4 for 6 mo.de Gramont regimen (infusional 5-FU/LV) for 6 mo.10-year OS rates for stage III - 67.1% vs 59.0 % (HR, 0.80; P = 0.016) in favor of FOLFOX. 10-year OS rates for stage II - 78.4% vs 79.5% (HR, 1.00; P = 0.980). FOLFOX replaced 5-FU/LV as the standard adjuvant therapy in resected stage III CC.
NSABP C-07[17,90]Stage II and stage III2407FLOX for 6 mo.Bolus 5-FU/LV (Roswell Park) for 6 mo.5-yr DFS 69.4 vs 64.2% favoring FLOX (HR, 0.82; 95%CI, 0.72–0.93; P = 0.002) corresponding to an 18% relative reduction in the risk of a DFS event. 5-yr OS was similar between treatment groups.
NO169968/ XELOXA[16]Stage III1886CAPOX- 6 mo.bolus 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic or Roswell Park regimen) for 6 mo.7-yr DFS rates 63% versus 56% in favor of CAPOX (HR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.69–0.93; P = 0.004). 7-year OS rates 73% vs 67% in favor of CAPOX (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.70–0.99; P = 0.04).
IDEA meta-analysis[54]Stage III12834FOLFOX or CAPOX for 3 mo.FOLFOX or CAPOX for 6 mo.Noninferiority of 3 mo versus 6 mo treatment was not confirmed in the overall study population. Among the patients with low-risk tumors (T1-T3, N1), 3 mo of therapy with CAPOX was noninferior to 6 mo, with a 3-year rate of disease-free survival of 85.0% versus 83.1% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.71-1.01).