Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2020; 12(6): 632-641
Published online Jun 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632
Published online Jun 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632
Table 4 Stratification analysis of anastomotic leakage in the anterior resection + anastomosis group (n = 424)
| Variables | High ligation (n = 218) | Low ligation (n = 216) | P value |
| AL patients, n (%) | 24 (11.0) | 6 (2.8) | 0.001 |
| Grade, n (%) | 0.464 | ||
| A | 0 | 0 | |
| B | 2 (0.1) | 0 | |
| C | 22 (10.1) | 6 (2.8) | |
| Onset of AL, n (%) | 0.464 | ||
| Early AL | 22 (10.1) | 6 (2.8) | |
| Delayed AL | 2 (0.1) | 0 |
- Citation: Chen JN, Liu Z, Wang ZJ, Zhao FQ, Wei FZ, Mei SW, Shen HY, Li J, Pei W, Wang Z, Yu J, Liu Q. Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(6): 632-641
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i6/632.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632