Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2020; 12(6): 632-641
Published online Jun 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632
Published online Jun 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632
Variables | High ligation (n = 235) | Low ligation (n = 227) | P value |
Type of operation, n (%) | 0.453 | ||
AR + anastomosis | 218 (92.7) | 216 (95.1) | |
AR + Hartmann's procedure | 5 (2.1) | 2 (0.9) | |
AR + anastomosis + ileostomy | 12 (5.1%) | 9 (4.0) | |
Conversion to open surgery, n (%) | 4 (1.7%) | 6 (2.6) | |
Operation time (min, mean ± SD) | 163.1 ± 51.3 | 174.4 ± 61.8 | 0.142 |
Estimated blood loss (mL, mean ± SD) | 47.5 ± 21.2 | 52.6 ± 23.7 | 0.363 |
Number of harvested lymph nodes (mean ± SD) | 16.8 ± 6.2 | 13.7 ± 7.4 | 0.399 |
Transanal tube, n (%) | 147 (62.5) | 96 (42.3) | < 0.001 |
Anastomotic leakage, n (%) | 24 (10.2) | 6 (2.6) | 0.001 |
Anastomotic bleeding, n (%) | 4 (1.7) | 3 (1.3) | 0.738 |
Urinary dysfunction, n (%) | 9 (3.8) | 7 (3.1) | 0.661 |
Time to first flatus (d, mean ± SD) | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 0.177 |
Hospital stay after operation (d, mean ± SD) | 7.0 ± 1.2 | 6.3 ± 1.3 | 0.236 |
- Citation: Chen JN, Liu Z, Wang ZJ, Zhao FQ, Wei FZ, Mei SW, Shen HY, Li J, Pei W, Wang Z, Yu J, Liu Q. Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(6): 632-641
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i6/632.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632