Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2020; 12(2): 124-148
Published online Feb 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i2.124
Published online Feb 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i2.124
Study setting | Sample type | Marker type | Biomarker(s) | Sensitivity (or its range) | Specificity (or its range) | Ref. |
Case-control | Stool | Bacterial | Fusobacterium nucleatum | 54.0%-92.8% | 79.8%-91.0% | [128-131] |
Case-control | Stool | Bacterial | clbA-positive bacteria | 56.4% | 81.5% | [131] |
Case-control | Stool | Bacterial panel | Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides clarus, Roseburia intestinalis and Clostridium hathewayi | 92.8% | 79.8% | [130] |
Case-control | Stool | Bacterial panel | clbA-positive bacteria and Fusobacterium nucleatum | 84.6% | 63.1% | [131] |
Case-control | Stool | Bacterial panel | Ratio of Fusobacterium nucleatum to Bifidobacterium | 84.6% | 92.3% | [132] |
Case-control | Stool | Bacterial panel | Combination of ratios of Fusobacterium nucleatum to Bifidobacterium and Fusobacterium nucleatum to Faecalibacterium prausnitzii | 90.0% | 90.2% | [132] |
Case-control (CRC and adenomatous polyps in the case group) | Stool | Bacterial panel | Fusobacterium nucleatum, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus bovis, Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, and Porphyromonas spp | 91.4% | 93.5% | [133] |
- Citation: Loktionov A. Biomarkers for detecting colorectal cancer non-invasively: DNA, RNA or proteins? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(2): 124-148
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i2/124.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i2.124