Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2020; 12(10): 1080-1090
Published online Oct 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1080
Published online Oct 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1080
Ref. | Design | Treatment arm(s) | Summary of results |
Kopetz et al[30] | Phase 2 | Vemurafenib (n = 21) | One (5%) patient had a partial response, 7 had stable disease. Median PFS was 2.1 mo |
Yaeger et al[40] | Phase 2 | Vemurafenib + Panitumumab (n = 15) | Two patients had partial responses; six achieved tumor shrinkage. Median PFS was 3.2 mo; median OS was 7.6 mo |
Corcoran et al[44] | Phase 2 | Dabrafenib + Trametinib (n = 43) | One patient had a complete response; five patients had a partial response, with an ORR of 12%; 56% of patients had stable disease |
Corcoran et al[36] | Phase 1/2 | Dabrafenib + Panitumumab (D + P) (n = 20) vs Dabrafenib + Trametinib + Panitumumab (D + T + P) (n=91) vs Trametinib + Panitumumab (T + P) (n = 31) | The ORR was 10%, 21%, and 0% for the D + P, D + T + P, and T + P, respectively. The median PFS was 3.5 mo in the D + P arm, 4.2 mo in the D + T + P arm, and 2.6 mo in the T + P arm |
Kopetz et al[41], (SWOG 1406 trial) | Phase 2 | Irinotecan + Cetuximab + Vemurafenib (n = 54) vs Irinotecan + Cetuximab (n = 52) | The median PFS 4.4 vs 2.0 mo (P < 0.001); the ORR 16% vs 4% (P = 0.09); disease control rate 67% vs 22% (P < 0.001) |
van Geel et al[47] | Phase 2 | Encorafenib + Cetuximab (n = 50) vs Encorafenib + Cetuximab + Alpelisib (n = 52) | The median PFS was 4.2 mo for encorafenib + cetuximab, and 5.4 mo for triplet therapy. The ORR rate was 22% and 27%, respectively |
Kopetz et al[45], (BEACON CRC trial) | Phase 3 | Encorafenib + Cetuximab + Binimetinib (Triplet arm) (n = 224) vs Encorafenib + Cetuximab (Doublet arm) (n = 220) vs Irinotecan/FOLFIRI + Cetuximab (Control arm) (n = 221) | The median OS was 9.0 mo in the triplet arm (HR for death vs control arm, 0.52; 95%CI: 0.39-0.70; P < 0.001), 8.4 mo in the doublet arm (HR for death vs control arm, 0.60; 95%CI: 0.45-0.79; P < 0.001), and 5.4 mo in the control arm. The ORR was 26%, 20%, and 2% for the triplet arm, the doublet arm, and the control arm, respectively |
- Citation: Kanat O, Ertas H, Caner B. Contemporary treatment approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer driven by BRAF V600 mutations. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(10): 1080-1090
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i10/1080.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1080