Near-infrared fluorescence guided esophageal reconstructive surgery: A systematic review

Table 2 Influence of Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on intraoperative decisions and on anastomotic leakage

Ref.	Entire cohort n = 1186		ICGA study group n = 752		Non ICGA n = 434
		ICGA good perfused AS, n = 592	ICGA good perfused altered AS, n = 93	ICGA poor perfused AS, n = 67
Shimada et al[40]	3/36	2/31	1/5 Superdrainage	-	-
Kubota et al[18]	0/4	0/4	-	-	-
Murawa et al[19]	1/15	1/11	0/4 End-to-end	-	-
Pacheco et al[20]	2/11	1/10	-	1/1	-
Kumagai et al[21]	2/20	2/20	-	-	-
Rino et al[22]	5/33	5/33	-	-	-
Sarkaria et al[23]	2/30	2/30	-	-	-
Hodari et al[25]	3/54	0/39	-	-	3/15
Campbell et al[26]	12/90	0/21	-	-	12/69
Yukaya et al[27]	9/27	9/27	-	-	-
Zehetner et al[28]	24/144	2/95	-	22/49	-
Koyonagi et al[30]	7/40	0/25	-	7/15	-
Schlottmann et al[33]	0/5	0/3	0/2 resection	-	-
Kitagawa et al[29,34]	7/72	3/41 ICG-LMM	0/5 ICG-LMM	-	-
		4/26 ICG	- 0/4 End-to-end
			- 0/1 Superdrainage
Ohi et al[32,35]	10/120	0/50	1/9	-	9/61
			- 0/3 End-to-end
			- 1/1 Supercharge/drain
			- 0/5 Manubriotomy
Karampiris et al[36]	13/90	0/7	1/26 Resection	2/2	10/55
Noma et al[37]	60/285	6/70	0/1 Supercharge/drain	-	54/214
Dalton et al[38]	3/40	0/14	2/6 Resection	-	1/20
Kumagai et al[39]	1/70	0/35	1/35 Resection	-	-

ICGA: Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography.