Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2019; 11(3): 208-226
Published online Mar 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i3.208
Published online Mar 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i3.208
Table 9 Computed tomography evaluated ileocolic artery stumps in the literature
| Study, year | n | Actual ileocolic stump in mm | Presumed D2 ileocolic stump in mm |
| Group A - our study, 2018, mean ± SD (95%CI) | 12 | 17.69 ± 4.77 (13.94-19.96) | 11.12 ± 2.97 (9.23-13.00) |
| Munkedal et al[22] 2017, mean (95%CI) | 32 | 31.0 (25-37) | 10.01 |
| Kaye et al[26] 2015, mean, (range) | 128 | 28.1 (2.5–74.3) | 14.4 (6.4) |
| Spasojevic et al[25] 2011, mean ± SD | 11 | 28.0 ± 9.3 | 18.1 ± 4.0 |
- Citation: Livadaru C, Morarasu S, Frunza TC, Ghitun FA, Paiu-Spiridon EF, Sava F, Terinte C, Ferariu D, Lunca S, Dimofte GM. Post-operative computed tomography scan – reliable tool for quality assessment of complete mesocolic excision. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(3): 208-226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v11/i3/208.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i3.208