Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with surgical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis

doi:10.4251/wjgo.v11.i2.161

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8589)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

550

WORD

348

HTML

4437

Figures (1-6)

326

Tables (1-1)

310

Sum=5971

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1011

Download

1607

Sum=2618

Feb 15, 2019 (publication date) through Feb 21, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (32)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology

ISSN

1948-5204

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2019; 11(2): 161-171
Published online Feb 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i2.161

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Comparison of overall survival and event-free survival for endoscopic submucosal dissection vs surgical resection in early gastric cancer. A: Overall survival; B Event-free survival.

Citation: Li H, Feng LQ, Bian YY, Yang LL, Liu DX, Huo ZB, Zeng L. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with surgical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(2): 161-171
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v11/i2/161.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i2.161