Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2019; 11(11): 1081-1091
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1081
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1081
Ref. | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and personnel | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other bias |
Paireder et al[9] | Low risk | High risk | Unclear risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk |
Mariette et al[8] | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Unclear risk | Unclear risk | Unclear risk |
- Citation: Yang J, Chen L, Ge K, Yang JL. Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(11): 1081-1091
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v11/i11/1081.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1081