Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2019; 11(10): 857-865
Published online Oct 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.857
Table 1 Comparative use of total neoadjuvant treatment vs conventional neoadjuvant treatment approach by baseline characteristics in patients receiving treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma
CharacteristicTNT, n = 254 (%)Conventional neoadjuvant treatment, n = 8812 (%)OR95%CIP value
Sex
Male151 (59)5497 (62)1Ref
Female103 (41)3315 (38)1.130.88-1.460.34
Race
White205 (81)7757 (88)1Ref
African American22 (8)624 (7)1.330.85-2.090.21
Other27 (11)431 (5)2.371.57-3.58< 0.0001
Comorbidity score
0224 (88)7175 (81)1Ref
127 (11)1366 (16)0.630.42-0.950.026
≥ 23 (1)271 (3)0.350.11-1.110.08
Insurance
Not Insured9 (3)417 (5)1Ref
Private Payer178 (70)5313 (60)1.550.79-3.050.20
Government63 (25)2981 (34)0.980.48-1.980.95
Unrecorded4 (2)101 (1)1.840.55-6.080.32
Education %
≥ 2939 (15)1262 (14)1Ref
20 to 28.953 (21)2231 (25)0.770.51-1.170.22
14 to 19.984 (33)2960 (34)0.920.62-1.350.66
Locations
Metro209 (82)6915 (78)1Ref
Urban16 (6)1474 (17)0.360.22-0.600.0001
Rural4 (2)207 (2)0.640.24-1.740.38
Unrecorded25 (10)216 (2)3.832.48-5.92< 0.0001
Income, United States dollars
< 3000025 (10)1391 (16)1Ref
30000 to 3500037 (15)2086 (24)0.990.59-1.650.96
35000 to 4599953 (20)2510 (29)1.170.73-1.900.51
> 46000139 (55)2773 (31)2.791.81-4.29< 0.0001
Distance to treatment facility, miles
≤ 8.582 (32)3561 (41)1Ref
> 8.5172 (68)5205 (59)1.441.10-1.870.0079
Age distribution in yr
≤ 65208 (82)6734 (76)1Ref
> 6546 (18)2078 (24)0.720.52-0.990.04
Year of diagnosis
2004-200611 (4)1125 (13)1Ref
2007-200919 (7)2256 (26)0.860.41-1.820.69
2010-201273 (29)3097 (35)2.411.27-4.560.0068
2013-2015151 (59)2334 (26)6.623.57-12.25<0.0001
Stage grouping
250 (20)3644 (41)1Ref
3204 (80)5168 (59)2.882.11-3.93< 0.0001
Nodes
0170 (67)5277 (60)1Ref
125 (10)1089 (12)0.710.47-1.090.12