Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2018; 10(7): 159-171
Published online Jul 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i7.159
Published online Jul 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i7.159
Table 1 Summary of selected randomized phase III HER2 trials in HER2-amplified gastro-oesophageal cancer and breast cancer
Study title | Setting | n | Treatment arms | Primary endpoint | OS | PFS | HR and P value |
Trastuzumab 1st line metastatic | |||||||
ToGA[5] | 1st line metastatic GOC | 594 | Trastuzumab + chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone | OS | Trastuzumab + chemotherapy: 13.8 mo (95%CI: 12-16) Chemotherapy alone: OS 11.1 mo (10-13) | Trastuzumab + chemotherapy: 6.7 mo (95%CI: 6-8) Chemotherapy alone: 5.5 mo (5-6) | HR = 0.74; 95%CI: 0.60-0.91; P = 0.0046) |
Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2[19] | 1st line metastatic breast cancer | 469 | Trastuzumab + chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone | PFS | Trastuzumab + chemotherapy: 25.1 mo Chemotherapy alone: 20.3 mo | Trastuzumab + chemotherapy: 7.4 mo Chemotherapy alone: 4.6 mo | P = 0.046 |
Lapatinib 1st line metastatic | |||||||
LOGiC[7] | 1st line metastatic GOC | 545 | Lapatinib + CAPOX vs Placebo + CAPOX | OS | Lapatinib + CAPOX: 12.2 mo (95%CI: 10.6-14.2) Placebo + CAPOX: 10.5 mo (9.0-11.3) | Lapatinib + CAPOX: 6 mo (95%CI: 5.6-7.0) Placebo + CAPOX: 5.4 mo (4.4-5.7) | HR = 0.91; 95%CI: 0.73-1.12 P value not significant (exact value not given) |
Randomized trial of lapatinib vs placebo added to paclitaxel in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer[29] | 1st line metastatic breast cancer | 444 | Lapatinib + paclitaxel vs Placebo + paclitaxel | OS | Lapatinib + paclitaxel: 27.8 mo (95%CI: 23.2-32.2 mo) Placebo + paclitaxel: 20.5 mo (17.9-24.3 mo) | Lapatinib + paclitaxel: 9.7 mo (95%CI: 9.2-11.1 mo) Placebo + paclitaxel: 6.5 mo (5.5-7.3 mo) | HR = 0.74; 95%CI: 0.58-0.94; P = 0.0124 |
Lapatinib 2nd line metastatic | |||||||
Tytan[8] | 2nd line metastatic GOC | 261 | Lapatinib + Paclitaxel vs Paclitaxel alone | OS | Lapatinib + Paclitaxel: 11.0 mo Paclitaxel alone: 8.9 mo | Lapatinib + Paclitaxel: 5.5 mo Paclitaxel alone: 4.4 mo | HR = 0.84; 95%CI: 0.64-1.11 P = 0.1044 |
Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-Positive advanced breast Cancer[30] | 2nd line metastatic breast cancer | 324 included in preliminary analysis | Lapatinib + capecitabine vs capecitabine alone | PFS | Not reported | Lapatinib + capecitabin: 8.4 mo Capecitabine alone: 4.4 mo | HR = 0.49; 95%CI: 0.34 to 0.71; P < 0.001 |
T-DM1 2nd line metastatic | |||||||
GATSBY[35] | 2nd line metastatic GOC | 345 | T-DM1 vs taxane | OS | T-DM1: 7.9 mo Taxane: 8.6 mo | T-DM1: 2.7 mo Taxane: 2.9 mo | HR = 1.15, 95%CI: 0.87–1.51; P = 0·86 |
EMILIA[33] | 2nd line metastatic breast cancer | 991 | T-DM1 vs lapatinib + capecitabine | PFS | T-DM1: 30.9 mo Lapatinib + capecitabine: 25.1 mo | T-DM1: 9.6 mo Lapatinib + capecitabine: 6.4 mo | HR = 0.65; 95%CI: 0.55 to 0.77; P < 0.001 |
- Citation: Lote H, Valeri N, Chau I. HER2 inhibition in gastro-oesophageal cancer: A review drawing on lessons learned from breast cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10(7): 159-171
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v10/i7/159.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i7.159