Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2018; 10(6): 137-144
Published online Jun 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i6.137
Published online Jun 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i6.137
Table 2 Characteristics of patients with positive resection margin
Patients’ No | Age | Gender | BMI (kg/m2) | Distance from anal verge (cm) | Diameter (cm) | Surgery duration (min) | Position | Post-op stay | Type of positive margin | Pathology | Post-op treatment |
1 | 58 | 2 | 19.9 | 7 | 2 | 50 | Lloyd-Davies | 1 | Lateral | Adenocarcinoma | Curative surgery |
2 | 75 | 2 | 23.2 | 10 | 2 | 60 | Lloyd-Davies | 1 | Basal | NET-G1 | Imatinib |
3 | 64 | 2 | 26.1 | 6 | 1.5 | 45 | Lloyd-Davies | 4 | Basal | NET-G1 | Imatinib |
4 | 63 | 2 | 20.0 | 10 | 0.5 | 60 | Lloyd-Davies | 2 | Lateral | NET-G1 | Imatinib |
5 | 59 | 1 | 24.8 | 8 | 1.5 | 30 | Lloyd-Davies | 3 | Lateral | Adenocarcinoma | Chemo-radiation |
- Citation: Chen N, Peng YF, Yao YF, Gu J. Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neoplasia: Experience from single tertiary institution in China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10(6): 137-144
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v10/i6/137.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i6.137