Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2018; 10(11): 431-438
Published online Nov 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i11.431
Table 2 Analyses of survival outcomes by primary tumor location
SubgroupOS events n (%)Median OS, mo (95%CI)
Hazard ratio (95%CI)P-valuePFS events n (%)Median PFS, mo (95%CI)
Hazard ratio (95%CI)P-value
Left-sidedRight-sidedLeft-sidedRight-sided
All eligible patients (n = 168)138 (82.1)16.3 (13.5-19.0)9.3 (3.4-15.1)0.74 (0.48-1.13)0.164151 (89.9)5.7 (5.3-6.1)4.2 (3.2-5.1)0.96 (0.64-1.50)0.851
KRAS wild type (n = 55)44 (76.4)17.6 (12.3-22.9)15.4 (6.0-24.7)0.85 (0.33-2.19)0.7451 (92.7)5.1 (4.2-5.9)4.0 (2.7-5.3)0.76 (0.32-1.81)0.529
KRAS mutation (n = 25)18 (72)10.9 (0-34.6)9.0 (2.4-15.5)0.77 (0.29-2.02)0.622 (88)4.8 (2.9-6.6)2.1 (0-5.0)0.97 (0.36-2.58)0.956
KRAS unknown (n = 88)78 (88.6)16.1 (14.1-18.1)9.3 (6.9-11.7)0.69 (0.38-1.24)0.21878 (88.6)6.2 (5.1-7.3)6.0 (3.3-8.7)0.75 (0.42-1.33)0.324
Bevacizumab (n = 29)21 (72.4)24.5 (16.6-32.3)9.3 (-)0.30 (0.06-1.43)0.1127 (93.1)6.2 (4.9-7.4)4.0 (-)0.45 (0.10-2.01)0.285
Cetuximab (n = 16)12 (75)16.5 (9.0-23.9)8.2 (-)0.21 (0.03-1.29)0.06515 (93.8)3.6 (0.89-6.3)4.0 (-)0.42 (0.08-2.06)0.269