Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2018; 10(10): 328-335
Published online Oct 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.328
Published online Oct 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.328
Table 2 Imaging modalities for pulmonary embolism verification
PE | ECG | CTPA | V/Q Scan | MRA |
Findings | Sinus tachycardia Non-specific ST-T disorders S1Q3T3 pattern Atrial fibrillation Right heart strain | Intraluminal filling defect of pulmonary artery after injection of contrast material | Ventilated area not perfused | Increased signal intensity of pulmonary thrombi within pulmonary artery after injection of gadolinium |
Advantages | Immediate Costless | Criterion standard for diagnosis | Radiation dose lower than CTPA | High sensitivity and specificity for central, lobar, and segmental emboli |
Disadvantages | Low sensitivity and specificity | Invasiveness Hypersensitivity reactions Renal toxicity | - | Inadequate for subsegmental emboli |
- Citation: Mastoraki A, Mastoraki S, Schizas D, Patras R, Krinos N, Papanikolaou IS, Lazaris A, Liakakos T, Arkadopoulos N. Facing the challenge of venous thromboembolism prevention in patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures for gastrointestinal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10(10): 328-335
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v10/i10/328.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.328