Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2018; 10(10): 282-289
Published online Oct 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.282
Published online Oct 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.282
Ref. | Patient No. | Treatment group(s) | Intraperitoneal regimen | Systemic regimen | Outcomes | |
Aizawa et al[17], 2015 | 47 | NA systemic chemo | -- | Variable | 48.9% converted to negative cytology | |
Negative cytology Median OS: 30.4 mo | Positive cytology Median OS: 15.0 mo | |||||
Badgwell et al[18], 2017 | 19 | NA systemic chemo, then NLHIPEC, then gastrectomy if peritoneal disease cleared | MMC and cisplatin | Variable | 36.8% converted to negative cytology or had clearance of PC Entire cohort median OS: 30.2 mo | |
Fujiwara et al[19], 2011 | 25 | NA systemic and IP chemo → gastrectomy if peritoneal disease cleared | MMC and cisplatin | IV docetaxel, 5-fu, cisplatin | 56% converted to negative cytology or had clearance of PC | |
Negative Median OS: 27.1 mo | Positive Median OS: 9.6 mo | |||||
Ishigami et al[20], 2009 | 40 | NA systemic and IP chemo | Paclitaxel | IV paclitaxel and oral S-1 | Median OS: 22.5 mo |
- Citation: Leiting JL, Grotz TE. Optimizing outcomes for patients with gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10(10): 282-289
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v10/i10/282.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.282