Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2017; 9(9): 471-479
Published online Sep 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.471
Published online Sep 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.471
Variable1 | Caecal intubation rate, n (%)2 | Odds ratio (95%CI)1 | P value1 |
Sedation type | |||
Midazolam ± opioid | 10562 (93.7) | Reference | |
Entonox ± opioid | 3612 (94.4) | 1.08 (0.92-1.28) | 0.34 |
Unmedicated | 1763 (94.2) | 0.98 (0.79-1.22) | 0.87 |
Age | 0.98 (0.97-0.98) | < 0.001 | |
Gender | |||
Female | 8159 (92.7) | Reference | |
Male | 7778 (95.3) | 1.61 (1.41-1.85) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Robertson AR, Kennedy NA, Robertson JA, Church NI, Noble CL. Colonoscopy quality with Entonox®vs intravenous conscious sedation: 18608 colonoscopy retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(9): 471-479
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i9/471.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.471