Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2017; 9(8): 378-388
Published online Aug 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.378
Table 2 Reported diagnostic yields of endoscopic ultrasonography of focal liver lesions
Ref./study designStudy populationPatient number/EUS-FNAEUS diagnostic yieldEUS-FNA diagnostic yield
Awad et al[13] Prospective unicenter studySuspected HCC or metastatic liver carcinoma14/9EUS identified all hepatic lesions (n = 14) previously reported by CT 4 new/additional lesions identified by EUSAll FNA passes yielded adequate specimens (malignant: n = 8; benign: n = 1)
Singh et al[14] Prospective unicenter studyHigh risk for HCC17/16The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI, and EUS/EUS-FNA were 38%, 69%, 92%, and 94%Cytologic diagnosis of primary liver tumor was established in 8 cases (HCC = 7; cholangiocarcinoma = 1)
DeWitt et al[15] Retrospective unicenter studyStaging EUS examinations for known or suspected malignancy77/77EUS features predictive of malignant hepatic lesions were the presence of regular outer margins and the detection of two or more lesions45 aspirates were diagnostic for malignancy (metastasis: n = 44; HCC = 1)