Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2017; 9(5): 211-219
Published online May 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i5.211
Published online May 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i5.211
No. of patients | Group A 25 | Group B 18 | P |
Demographic and personal details, mean (SD) | |||
Mean age | 55.8 (± 10.2) | 56.1 (± 8.6) | 0.9 |
Parity | 2 (± 0.9) | 1.5 (± 0.6) | 0.14 |
BMI | 25.2 (± 4.7) | 23.9 (± 2.7) | 0.41 |
Symptomatic preoperative findings | |||
Vaginal bulge, n (%) | 25 (100) | 18 (100) | > 0.99 |
Stress urinary incontinence, n (%) | 4 (16) | 2 (11.1) | > 0.99 |
ODS, n (%) | 0 | 0 | > 0.99 |
Constipation, n (%) | 3 (12) | 3 (16.6) | 0.68 |
POPDI-6 (PFDI)a, mean (SD) | 53.9 (± 13.8) | 51.6 (± 1.5) | 0.52 |
UDI-6 (PFDI)b, mean (SD) | 12.3 (± 19.4) | 21.2 (± 2.4) | 0.21 |
CRADI-8 (PFDI)c, mean (SD) | 9.0 (± 12.2) | 11.1 (± 1.2) | 0.58 |
Agachan-Wexner scored, mean (SD) | 3.9 (± 4.2) | 6.4 (± 9.1) | 0.08 |
PISQ-12e, mean (SD) | 10.1 (± 3.9) | 9.11 (± 3.8) | 0.38 |
POP-Q stage at baseline, n (%) | |||
Utero-vaginal prolapse | 13 (52) | 14 (77.8) | 0.11 |
Vaginal cuff prolapse | 6 (24) | 4 (28.6) | > 0.99 |
Anterior stage 2 | 12 (48) | 8 (44.4) | > 0.99 |
Anterior stage 3 | 5 (20) | 7 (38.8) | 0.3 |
Anterior stage 4 | 0 | 0 | > 0.99 |
Apical stage 2 | 12 (48) | 7 (38.8) | 0.75 |
Apical stage 3 | 10 (40) | 9 (50) | 0.54 |
Apical stage 4 | 3 (12) | 2 (11.1) | > 0.99 |
Posterior stage 2 | 3 (12) | 5 (27.7) | 0.24 |
Posterior stage 3 | 2 (8) | 0 | 0.5 |
Posterior stage 4 | 0 | 0 | > 0.99 |
Intraoperative data | |||
Concomitant subtotal hysterectomy, n (%) | 13 (52) | 13 (72.2) | 0.21 |
Concomitant total hysterectomy, n (%) | 0 | 1 (5.5) | 0.41 |
Concomitant sub-urethral sling placement, n (%) | 4 (16) | 2 (11.1) | > 0.99 |
Cervical stump fixation, n (%) | 13 (52) | 13 (72.2) | 0.21 |
Vaginal cuff fixation, n (%) | 6 (24) | 5 (27.8) | > 0.99 |
Uterine preservation, n (%) | 6 (24) | 0 | 0.03 |
Operating time (min), mean (SD) | 132 (± 27) | 141 (± 21) | 0.11 |
Hb decrease (g/dL), mean (SD) | 1.1 (± 0.6) | 1.2 (± 0.5) | 0.48 |
Hospital stay, mean (SD) | 2.2 (± 1.1) | 2.9 (± 1.1) | 0.06 |
- Citation: Cosma S, Petruzzelli P, Danese S, Benedetto C. Nerve preserving vs standard laparoscopic sacropexy: Postoperative bowel function. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(5): 211-219
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i5/211.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i5.211