Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2017; 9(4): 196-203
Published online Apr 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.196
Published online Apr 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.196
Table 3 Comparison of characteristics of recurrences (n = 10) vs no recurrence (n = 10)
| Recurrence (n = 10) | No recurrence (n = 10) | |
| Non-ampullary/ ampullary | 5:5 | 7:3 |
| Median size (mm) | 20 mm | 10 mm |
| Treatment | ||
| Endoscopic resection | 10 | 8 |
| Surgical resection | 0 | 2 |
| Specimen retrieval | ||
| Piecemeal | 8 | 6 |
| En bloc | 2 | 4 |
| Margin positivity | 9 (90%) | 6 (60%) |
| Salvage therapy | ||
| Endoscopic resection | 8 | |
| Surgical resection | 2 |
- Citation: Rajkomar K, Kweon M, Khan I, Frankish P, Rodgers M, Koea JB. Endoscopic assessment and management of sporadic duodenal adenomas: The results of single centre multidisciplinary management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(4): 196-203
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i4/196.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.196