Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2017; 9(4): 183-188
Published online Apr 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.183
Published online Apr 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.183
Table 3 Predictors of clinical response n (%)
Characteristic | Clinical response | P value | |
Y (19) | N (5) | ||
Age, mean ± SD | 61.9 ± 11.9 | 66.4 ± 22.4 | 0.48 |
Sex, Male | 10 (53) | 2 (40) | 0.68 |
Technique | |||
Retrograde | 16 | 3 | 0.49 |
Static | 3 | 2 | |
Maximal dilator size (mean ± SD, mm) | 19.2 ± 1.4 | 19.6 ± 0.9 | 0.25 |
Oropharyngeal dysfunction | 11 (58) | 2 (40) | 0.68 |
Zenker’s diverticulum | 4 (21) | 2 (40) | 0.45 |
- Citation: Chandrasekhara V, Koh J, Lattimer L, Dunbar KB, Ravich WJ, Clarke JO. Endoscopic balloon catheter dilatation via retrograde or static technique is safe and effective for cricopharyngeal dysfunction. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(4): 183-188
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i4/183.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.183