Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2017; 9(3): 105-126
Published online Mar 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i3.105
Published online Mar 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i3.105
Table 2 Results of endoscopic stenting in anastomotic and staple-line leaks after bariatric surgery
Ref. | Nº patients | Bariatric procedure | Time interval to stent | Type of stent | Success rate (%) | Complications rate1 | Migration rate (%) | Nº of procedures | Time to fistula closure |
Salinas et al[98] | 17 | RYGB | 1-3 wk | PCSEMS | 94 | 41% 1 migration, 2 mucosal tears, 4 stent obstruction by food | 6 | 1.2 (1-2) | 3.2 ± 1.2 mo |
Eisendrath et al[99] | 21 | RYGB/ LGS/DS | 31 d (14-199) | PCSEMS | 81 | 14% 1 migration, 2 dysphagia due to tissue hyperplasia | 5 | 1-6 | NA |
Eubanks et al[100] | 13 | RYGB/LGS | Acute leaks (11) Chronic leaks (2) | FCSEMS/FCSEPS | 77 | 70% (not specified) | NA | NA | Acute leaks - 33 d Chronic leaks - 45 d |
Blackmon et al[101] | 10 | RYGB/LGS | NA | FCSEMS/PCSEMS | 100 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Leenders et al[102] | 11 | RYGB/LSG | 8 d (1-33) | FCSEMS | 73 | 50% 3 disintegrated stent, 2 migration | 17 | 2 (1-4) | 16 wk (5-63) |
El Mourad et al[103] | 47 | RYGB/LSG/DS | 10.5 d (1-74) | PCSEMS | 87 | 30% 1 mucosal stripping, 1 perforation, 1 dysphagia, 1 stricture, 1 bleeding 1 stent angulation, 7 migration | 15 | NA | 44 d (3-90) |
Orive-Calzada et al[104] | 11 | LSG | NA | FCSEMS | 73 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Alazmi et al[105] | 17 | LSG | < 1 wk (10) 1 wk-1 mo (6) > 1 mo (1) | PCSEMS | 76 | 36% 2 bleeding, 3 dysphagia, 1 migration | 6 | NA | 42 d (28-84) |
Quezada et al[106] | 29 | RYGB/SG | 8 d (0-104) | CSEMS | 96.5 | 41% 10 migration, 1 stent fracture, 1 opening of blind end of alimentary limb | 34 | NA | 82 d (2-352) |
Murino et al[107] | 91 | RYGB/LSG | 25 d (2-308) | PCSEMS | 81 | 22% 5 bleeding, 2 perforation (1 death), 7 migration, 13 esophageal stricture | 8 | 1 (1-7) | NA |
Fishman et al[108] | 26 | LSG | < 1 wk (1) 1-6 wk (17) 7-12 wk (5) > 12 wk (3) | FCSEMS2 | 65 | 46% 4 severe stent intolerance (stent removal) 1 severe bleeding, 7 migration | 27 | NA | NA |
Southwell et al[109] | 21 | LSG | < 1 wk (6) 1-6 wk (12) 7-12 wk (1) > 12 wk (2) | FCSEMS2/PCSEMS | 95 | 86% 10 migration,, 2 esophageal strictures 1 leak due to erosion by the stent 5 severe intolerance (stent removal) | 48 | 5 (2-13) | 75 d (9-187) |
Van Wezenbeek et al[110] | 12 | RYGB/LSG | 8 d (0-24) | FCSEMS2 | 75 | 75% 7 migration, 1 perforation 1 perforation secondary to migration | 67 | 2.4 (1-3) | 38 d (28-49) |
Shehab et al[111] | 22 | RYGB/LSG | 11 d (3-30) | FCSEMS2 | 82 | 41% 1 perforation, 1 esophageal stricture, 4 migrations, 2 bleeding (1 death), 1 stent intolerance (removal) | 18 | 2.8 (2-5) | 6.8 wk (2-14) |
- Citation: Souto-Rodríguez R, Alvarez-Sánchez MV. Endoluminal solutions to bariatric surgery complications: A review with a focus on technical aspects and results. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(3): 105-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i3/105.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i3.105