Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2017; 9(2): 61-69
Published online Feb 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i2.61
Table 3 Associations among endoscopic findings (prior to or without histopathology) and gastric intestinal metaplasia
Frequency in patients with gastric IM, n = 418Frequency in patients without gastric IM, n = 171Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis (OR, 95%CI)
Gastritis100 (23.9%)37 (21.6%)P = 0.5571.34 (0.84, 2.08), P = 0.223
Atrophic gastritis55 (13.2%)9 (5.3%)P = 0.0042.05 (1.00, 4.58), P = 0.051
Gastric mass20 (4.8%)0 (0%)P = 0.0018.84 (1.88, ∞), P = 0.005
Gastric ulcer42 (10.0%)11 (6.4%)P = 0.1631.42 (0.71, 3.01), P = 0.339
Gastric nodularity71 (17.0%)33 (19.3%)P = 0.5030.74 (0.46, 1.20), P = 0.213
Linitis plastica1 (0.2%)0 (0%)P = 0.7100.27 (0.01, ∞), P = 0.788
Esophagitis28 (6.7%)23 (13.4%)P = 0.0110.49 (0.26, 0.91), P = 0.023
Esophageal mass2 (0.5%)13 (7.6%)P < 0.0010.04 (0.01-0.16), P < 0.001
Barrett’s esophagus21 (5.0%)13 (7.6%)P = 0.2350.56 (0.26, 1.21), P = 0.134
Duodenitis17 (4.1%)11 (6.4%)P = 0.2340.69 (0.30, 1.60), P = 0.337
Duodenal polyp8 (1.9%)0 (0%)P = 0.0634.21 (0.81, ∞), P = 0.081
Duodenal mass4 (1.0%)0 (0%)P = 0.2531.58 (0.26, ∞), P = 0.353
Duodenal ulcer2 (0.5%)2 (1.2%)P = 0.4070.21 (0.02, 2.20), P = 0.179