Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2017; 9(2): 41-54
Published online Feb 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i2.41
Table 3 Characteristics and findings of studies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided alcohol ablation in pancreatic cystic lesions
Ref.YearNo.Ablative agentClinical diagnosis (%)Size mm (range)Septated cysts n (%)Follow-up months (range)ComplicationsPercentage of ablated cysts
Gan et al[5]200525EthanolMCN 56%, IPMN 12%, SCA 12%, PCs 4%, unknown 8%19.4 mean (6-37)7 (28)6-120%35%
Oh et al[72]200814Ethanol and paclitaxelMCN 14%, SCA 2%, lymphangioma 21%, unknown 43%25.5 median (17-52)3 (21.4)9 median (6-23)AP (7%)79%
Oh et al[73]200910Ethanol and paclitaxelMCN 30%, SCA 40%, unknown 30%29.5 median (20-68)10 (100)8.5 median (6-18)AP (10%)60%
DeWitt et al[75]200942Ethanol vs salineMCN 40%, IPMN 40%, SCA 12%, PCs 7%20.5 (10-40)17 (40.5)3-4 mo after 2nd lavageAP (2.4%), intracystic bleeding (2.4%), abdominal pain (24%), major complications, (24%)33% (ethanol) 0% (saline)
Oh et al[74]201152Ethanol and paclitaxelMCN 17%, SCA 29% PCs 4%, unknown 50%31.8 (17-68)20 (38.5)21.7 mean (2-44)Fever (2%), AP (2%), abdominal pain (2%), splenic vein obliteration (2%)62%
DiMaio et al[76]201113EthanolIPMN 100%20.1 mean (13-27.2)7 (54)3-6 mo after 2nd lavageAbdominal pain (15%)38%
Park et al[77]201691EthanolIndeterminate30 (20-50)64 (70)40 median (13-117)Fever (9%), abdominal pain (20%) AP (3%)45%
Moyer et al[78]201610Ethanol or saline plus paclitaxel and gemcitabineMCN 70%, IPMN 30%, unknown 10%30Unilocular predominantly12AP (10 %)75% (ethanol plus paclitaxel and gemcitabine) 67% (alcohol free harm)