Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2017; 9(12): 561-570
Published online Dec 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561
Published online Dec 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561
Table 6 Secondary outcome in the cohort‘ indefinite for curative resection or non- curative resection
Variable | Indefinite, n = 10 | CR, n = 5 |
Number of patients under endoscopic follow-up, n (%) | 9 (90) | 5 (100) |
Median follow-up, mo | 2 | 3 |
Mean follow-up, mo | 5.1 | 8.5 |
Range, mo | 0-19 | 0-22 |
Length of time since ESD, mean ± SD, mo | 13.3 ± 11.3 | 12.2 ± 11.1 |
Length of time since ESD, range, mo | 2 - 38 | 0 - 26 |
Number of patients with metachronous or synchronous disease post ESD, n | 2 | 0 |
- Citation: Sooltangos A, Davenport M, McGrath S, Vickers J, Senapati S, Akhtar K, George R, Ang Y. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for early neoplasia and for accurate staging of early cancers in a United Kingdom Caucasian population. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(12): 561-570
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i12/561.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561