Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2017; 9(12): 561-570
Published online Dec 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561
Published online Dec 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561
Table 4 Results of endoscopic submucosal dissection n (%)
Variable | Value, n = 21 |
Average number of ESD per patient (including failed ESD) | 1.3 |
Number of en-bloc resections | 15 (71.4) |
Number of pieces in which lesions were resected | |
Mean ± SD | 1.5 ± 1.4 |
Range | 1-7 |
Unspecified but > 1 | 2 |
Rate of complete resection on endoscopy | 19 (90.5) |
Rate of complete resection on histology | 8 (38.1) |
Margins clear on histology of ESD specimen | |
Both VM and HM | 8 (38.1) |
VM only | 1 (4.8) |
HM only | 1 (4.8) |
Neither VM nor HM | 1 (4.8) |
Not specified or difficult to interpret specimen due to coagulation effect/poor preservation of tissue | 10 (47.6) |
- Citation: Sooltangos A, Davenport M, McGrath S, Vickers J, Senapati S, Akhtar K, George R, Ang Y. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for early neoplasia and for accurate staging of early cancers in a United Kingdom Caucasian population. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(12): 561-570
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i12/561.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561