Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 25, 2016; 8(8): 362-367
Published online Apr 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i8.362
Published online Apr 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i8.362
EUS QIs | Rambam 2013-2014 EUS reports % documented (n = 200) | WJGE Lachter et al 2013 (data from 2009), EUS reports % documented (n = 100) | Improvement significance (P value) |
Pre-procedural | |||
Indications for procedure | 99% | 97% | NS |
Detailed patient description from referring physician | 100% | 8% | P < 0.001 |
Minimum 6 h NPO | 100% | 40% | P < 0.001 |
Antibiotics per protocol prior to FNA of pancreatic cysts | 99.5% | 94% | P = 0.0014 |
Listing of anesthesia administered prior to and during EUS | 100% | 61% | P < 0.001 |
Patient signed agreement of informed consent | 100% | 61% | P < 0.001 |
Intra-procedural | |||
Suspected pancreatic lesions should include parenchymal description of body, head, tail, and duct | 95% | 64% | P < 0.001 |
CBD and GB contents should be detailed and a description for sludge, stones or other findings | 98% | 0% | P < 0.001 |
LN detailed description as well as kidney and left liver lobe for lesions | 50% | 35% | P = 0.04 |
Celiac axis described for arterial structure along w/aorta, SMA and LNs | 13% | 5% | NS |
Description by TNM system | 100% | 95% | NS |
Detailing of lesions and surroundings in accordance with layers visualized by EUS | 75% | 65% | NS |
Degree of tumor penetration into organ mucosa and surrounding structures | 80% | 46% | NS |
Detailing presence of LN when suspicious for malignancy and when performing FNA | 100% | 6% | P < 0.001 |
Presence or absence of mechanical problems or difficulties including past abdominal surgeries or ascites | 100% | 2% | P < 0.001 |
Patient awakened or uncooperative during procedure | 78% | - | - |
No. of passes (FNA) | 67% | - | - |
Needle size | 99% | - | - |
No. of needles | 40% | - | - |
Impressions of aspirate (bloody, mucinous, color) | 100% | - | - |
Cytology/histology | 100% | - | - |
In-room tentative Dx | 100% | - | - |
Post-procedural | |||
Summary of Dx | 95% | 37% | P < 0.001 |
Exam findings, even if not relevant to reason for EUS referral | 100% | 80% | NS |
Physician recommendations with respect to exam findings | 99% | 52% | P < 0.001 |
Instructions for how patient will receive results | 100% | 0% | P < 0.001 |
Incidence of adverse events should be listed |
- Citation: Schwab R, Pahk E, Lachter J. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound quality assessment on improving endoscopic ultrasound reports and procedures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(8): 362-367
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i8/362.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i8.362