Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 25, 2016; 8(4): 232-238
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232
Table 5 Study endpoints - comparing staff endoscopists only with cases involving resident participation
| Resident involved (n = 66) | Staff endoscopist only (n = 164) | P-value | |
| Total procedure time | < 0.001 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 26.0 ± 10.2 | 12.9 ± 4.8 | < 0.001 |
| Total room time | < 0.001 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 44.4 ± 13.7 | 29.5 ± 9.8 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Thornley P, Al Beshir M, Gregor J, Antoniou A, Khanna N. Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(4): 232-238
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i4/232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232