Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 25, 2016; 8(4): 232-238
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232
Table 4 Results of the telephone patient satisfaction survey for endoscopist-administered sedation and anaesthesiologist-administered sedation with propofol groups n (%)
| EAC (n = 104) | AAP (n = 126) | P-value | |
| Response rate | 74 (71) | 80 (64) | 0.219 |
| Question 1: I was very satisfied with the care I received | 0.074 | ||
| Agree | 15 (20) | 8 (10) | |
| Strongly agree | 59 (80) | 72 (90) | |
| Question 2: I would strongly recommend this procedure to friends who qualify for it | 0.882 | ||
| Disagree | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Not sure | 2 (2.7) | 6 (7.5) | |
| Agree | 16 (22) | 13 (16) | |
| Strongly agree | 55 (74) | 61 (76) | |
| Question 3: I would be willing to repeat this examination again in the future if necessary | 0.667 | ||
| Disagree | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) | |
| Not sure | 2 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Agree | 8 (11) | 12 (15) | |
| Strongly agree | 64 (87) | 67 (84) | |
| Question 4: I did not experience too much pain/discomfort during the procedure | 0.021 | ||
| Strongly disagree | 4 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Disagree | 5 (6.8) | 2 (2.5) | |
| Not sure | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Agree | 7 (9.5) | 6 (7.5) | |
| Strongly agree | 57 (77) | 72 (90) |
- Citation: Thornley P, Al Beshir M, Gregor J, Antoniou A, Khanna N. Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(4): 232-238
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i4/232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232