Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: A prospective study

doi:10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8196)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

541

WORD

340

HTML

4313

Tables (1-5)

248

Sum=5442

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1074

Download

1680

Sum=2754

Feb 25, 2016 (publication date) through Nov 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (10)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 25, 2016; 8(4): 232-238
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232

Table 2 Multivariate analysis of procedure measurables

	Coefficient	P-value
BMI	-0.008	0.008
ASA class	0.066	0.016
Intervention - diagnostic	0.084	0.033
Intervention - therapeutic	0.246	< 0.001
Propofol sedation (AAP)	0.091	0.002
Resident involved	0.391	< 0.001

AAP: Anaesthesiologist-administered sedation with propofol; BMI: Body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologists.

Citation: Thornley P, Al Beshir M, Gregor J, Antoniou A, Khanna N. Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(4): 232-238
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i4/232.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.232