Current state of practice for colonic diverticular bleeding in 37 hospitals in Japan: A multicenter questionnaire study

Table 5 Association between procedures and outcomes n (%)

	Answer	SRH identification rate2
Procedure1 (Question No. 15)	(n = 37)	0%-20% (n = 15)	21%-40% (n = 16)	41%-60% (n = 4)	61%-80% (n = 1)	81%-100% (n = 0)	P for trend
Cap-assisted colonoscopy	17 (46.0)	4 (25.0)	9 (56.3)	2 (12.5)	1 (6.2)	0	0.081
Long cap-assisted colonoscopy	13 (35.1)	6 (46.2)	5 (38.5)	2 (15.3)	0	0	0.735
Inverting diverticulum via suction of colonoscopy	18 (48.7)	5 (29.4)	10 (58.8)	2 (11.8)	0	0	0.588
Wash out with water	36 (97.3)	14 (40.0)	16 (45.7)	4 (11.4)	1 (2.9)	0	0.323
Colonoscopy by multiple doctors	3 (8.1)	2 (66.7)	1 (33.3)	0	0	0	0.328
Colonoscopy under X-ray	3 (8.1)	2 (66.7)	1 (33.3)	0	0	0	0.328
	Answer	Rebleeding rate2
Endoscopic treatment (Question No. 18)		0%-20%	21%-40%	41%-60%	61%-80%	81%-100%	P for trend
	(n = 37)	(n = 22)	(n = 10)	(n = 3)	(n = 1)	(n = 0)
Clipping	31 (83.8)	19 (63.3)	8 (26.7)	3 (10.0)	0	0	0.290
Endoscopic band ligation	5 (13.5)	2 (40.0)	2 (40.0)	0	1 (20.0)	0	0.142
Epinephrine injection	1 (2.7)	1 (100)	0	0	0	0	0.489

¹Duplicated data allowed;

²Missing data included. Values in parentheses are percentages. SRH: Stigmata of recent bleeding.