Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2016; 8(20): 777-784
Published online Dec 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i20.777
Table 3 Univariate analysis of pancreatitis predictors
PredictorsOdds ratio95%CIP value
Sex (female)0.530.31-0.920.0245
Native papilla5.622.73-11.6< 0.0001
ENBD0.770.43-1.380.4313
EBS12.621.18-5.850.0129
EMS0.370.13-1.080.0784
EPS0.470.22-1.000.0528
Precut0.230.08-0.610.0102
EST0.490.28-0.840.0099
EPBD0.220.06-0.780.0405
EPLBD--0.3983
Pancreatic duct brush6.421.75-23.50.0186
2-h amylase ≥ 2 times ULN36.617.6-76.3< 0.0001
Cannulation time ≥ 13 min5.823.33-10.2< 0.0001
Procedure time ≥ 54 min4.702.70-8.18< 0.0001

  • Citation: Hayashi S, Nishida T, Shimakoshi H, Shimoda A, Amano T, Sugimoto A, Takahashi K, Mukai K, Matsubara T, Yamamoto M, Nakajima S, Fukui K, Inada M. Combination of two-hour post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography amylase levels and cannulation times is useful for predicting post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(20): 777-784
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i20/777.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i20.777