Endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions in special situations

Table 1 Clinical details of case series on endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage

Ref.	Technical success	Clinical success	Complications
Shah et al[21] (n = 25)	Pancreatography, 100% Pancreatic rendezvous, 50% Pancreatic duct intervention, 71%	N/A	10.5% (pneumoperitoneum, severe pancreatitis)
Ergun et al[22] (n = 20)	Pancreaticogastrostomy, 79% Rendezvous, 100%	Long-term, 72% Mean FU time = 7 mo FU range: 3 mo to 120 mo	10% (bleeding, peripancreatic collection) Long-term: Stent dysfunction 50% (plastic stents in all cases)
Will et al[23] (n = 12)	Pancreaticogastrotomy and rendezvous, 69%	73.2% FU range: 1 mo to 72 mo	42.9% (bleeding, perforation, pain)
Tessier et al[24] (n = 36)	Pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticobulbostomy, 92%	69.4% Mean FU time = 14.5 mo FU range: 4 mo to 55 mo	13.2% (fluid collection, hematoma)
Fujii et al[25] (n = 43)	Pancreaticogastrostomy, (antegrade: 18, retrograde: 14) overall: 74%	83% Mean FU time = 23 mo	Major: 6% (bleeding, perforation), overall: 24%
Barkay et al[26] (n = 21)	Pancreatography, 86% Pancreatic duct drainage, 48%	70% Mean FU time = 1 yr	2% (peri-pancreatic abscess, guidewire shearing)

N/A: Data not available; FU: Follow-up.