Same site submucosal tunneling for a repeat per oral endoscopic myotomy: A safe and feasible option

doi:10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.669

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 18

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7428)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

392

WORD

203

HTML

2889

Figures (1-4)

227

Sum=3711

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

578

Download

947

Sum=1525

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

911

Download

1281

Sum=2192

Oct 16, 2016 (publication date) through Nov 18, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Report

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2016; 8(18): 669-673
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.669

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Endoscopic pictures taken from the repeat per oral endoscopic myotomy showing: sigmoid esophagus (A), cardia before myotomy (B), mucosa of previous dissection site (C), Mucosal bleb (D), submucosal tunneling (E), initial myotomy (F), completed myotomy (G), cardia after submucosal tunnneling (H), closure of mucosotomy (I).

Citation: Wehbeh AN, Mekaroonkamol P, Cai Q. Same site submucosal tunneling for a repeat per oral endoscopic myotomy: A safe and feasible option. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(18): 669-673
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i18/669.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.669