Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 25, 2016; 8(16): 558-567
Published online Aug 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i16.558
Table 3 Comparison of the invasion depth diagnosis between endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoscopy
Clinical diagnosisHistologic diagnosis
EUSdiagnosis
P2Histologicdiagnosis
AccuracyP (vs EUS)
M/SM1SM2Overall accuracyAccuracy1M/SM1SM2
DiagnosisM/SM181971.282.6971879.70.54
SM214281325
Macroscopic type0.30
IM/SM1----5188.9-
SM2--03
IIa/IIbM/SM126467.377.832578.80.90
SM26969
IIcM/SM155580.485.1601279.30.32
SM2819713
Location0.55
UpperM/SM121274.48024480.0> 0.99
SM2611512
MiddleM/SM140769.978.5441178.30.98
SM2711410
LowerM/SM119262.285.229382.1> 0.99
SM22443
Histology0.79
Diff.M/SM1711070.483771280.50.63
SM28171118
Undiff.M/SM19175.08420677.1> 0.99
SM241227
Ulcer scar< 0.0001
PositiveM/SM13246.7507458.60.51
SM21211810
NegativeM/SM177775.689.4901484.70.29
SM2416515
Indication for ER< 0.0001
AbsoluteM/SM137-80.497.4b43-84.3f0.07
SM21-8-
ExpandedM/SM128-75.787.5d33-86.8h> 0.99
SM24-5-
Non-indicationM/SM1121356.162.7bd161864.1fh> 0.99
SM2925525