Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 10, 2016; 8(15): 517-532
Published online Aug 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i15.517
Published online Aug 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i15.517
Outcomes | Studies, n | Tumor, n | Rate (95%CI)1 |
Efficacy measures | |||
R0 resection | 24 | 8520 | 87 (84-90) |
Endoscopic en bloc resection | 29 | 9652 | 94 (91-96) |
Curative resection | 10 | 5234 | 83 (80-86) |
Safety measures | |||
Immediate perforation2 | 31 | 12076 | 3.1 (2.4-3.9) |
Immediate major bleeding2 | 6 | 303 | 2.9 (0.24-27) |
Delayed perforation3 | 6 | 1486 | 0.15 (0.01-3.8) |
Delayed bleeding3 | 29 | 11925 | 3.8 (3.0-4.7) |
Recurrence (if R0)4 | 8 | 724 | 0.14 (0.004-4.6) |
Recurrence (if not R0)4 | 7 | 152 | 8.5 (3.6-19) |
Recurrence (irrespective of R0 status)4 | 18 | 7681 | 0.77 (0.39-1.5) |
- Citation: Akintoye E, Obaitan I, Muthusamy A, Akanbi O, Olusunmade M, Levine D. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(15): 517-532
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i15/517.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i15.517