Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 25, 2016; 8(12): 451-457
Published online Jun 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i12.451
Published online Jun 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i12.451
Table 2 Comparison of clinical outcomes between the two techniques of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
| CSM-PLT group | Control group | P value | |
| (n = 20) | (n = 20) | ||
| Total procedure time in minutes, median (range) | 38.5 (8-145) | 59.5 (19-132) | 0.023 |
| En bloc resection, number of lesion (%) | 20 (100) | 20 (100) | - |
| Complications | |||
| Intractable bleeding during ESD, number of times, median (range) | 0 (0-4) | 1 (0-5) | 0.086 |
| Perforation during ESD, number of lesion (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - |
| Delayed perforation, number of lesion (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - |
| Delayed bleeding, number of lesion (%) | 0 (0) | 2 (10) | 0.157 |
| Anesthesia-related complications, number of lesions (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - |
- Citation: Yoshida N, Doyama H, Ota R, Takeda Y, Nakanishi H, Tominaga K, Tsuji S, Takemura K. Effectiveness of clip-and-snare method using pre-looping technique for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(12): 451-457
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i12/451.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i12.451