Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 10, 2016; 8(1): 13-22
Published online Jan 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.13
Published online Jan 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.13
Table 1 Published literature reporting endoscopic through-the-scope clip closure for oesophageal perforations
| Ref. | Cause | Size/mm | Time to treatment | Im/Tm/Tp | Method | Nr | Clinical success | Additional treatment | Hospital stay /d | Follow-up |
| Wewalka et al[7] | Perforation (1) | < 10 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 1/1 (100%) | None | ND | ND | |
| Rodella et al[44] | Leak (7) | 10-20 | > 24 | ND | Endoclip | ND | 2/7 (14%) | Yes | ND | 9.6 mo avg. |
| van Bodegraven et al[57] | Fistula (1) | 12 | > 24 | ND | Endoclip + argon beam electrocoagulation | ND | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | ND | 7 mo |
| Cipolletta et al[8] | Perforation (2) | 7-8 | < 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | 1 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 5 | 9 mo |
| 10 | < 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | 2 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 6 | 14 mo | ||
| Shimamoto et al[50] | Perforation (1) | 20 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 3 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 37 | ND |
| Abe et al[58] | Perforation (1) | 5 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 36 | ND |
| Mizobuchi et al[59] | Fistula (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 1 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | > 31 | ND |
| Raymer et al[9] | Fistula (3) | ≤ 25 | > 24 | Tm/Tp | Endoclip | ND | 3/3 (100%) | Yes | ND | ND |
| > 24 | Tm/Tp | Endoclip + surgery | ND | Yes | ND | ND | ||||
| > 24 | Tm/Tp | ND | Yes | ND | ND | |||||
| Shimizu et al[10] | Perforation (3) | 8/10/2008 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 3/3 (100%) | Yes | 14 | ND |
| Schubert et al[60] | Leak (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Stent + endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | ND | ND | 1 mo |
| Wehrmann et al[45] | Perforation (4) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 4/4 (100%) | Yes | 9-22 | 12 mo |
| Leak (3) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Endoscopic lavage + endoclip | ND | 3/3 (100%) | Yes | |||
| Matsuda et al[46] | Perforation (1) | 25 | < 24 | Im | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | No | ND | ND |
| Sriram et al[11] | Perforation (1) | 10 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | ND | ND |
| Fischer et al[61] | Perforation (4) | 20-40 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 2-6 | 4/4 (100%) | No | 7-18 | No |
| < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | No | No | ||||||
| < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | No | No | ||||||
| < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | No | No | ||||||
| Gerke et al[62] | Perforation (1) | 15 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 3 + 1 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 7 | 6 mo |
| Qadeer et al[28] | Fistula (1) | 3 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip + stent | 4 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 65 | 17 mo |
| Luigiano et al[56] | Fistula (1) | 25 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 5 | 1/1 (100%) | ND | ND | 1 mo |
| Endoloop | 1 | |||||||||
| Ivekovic et al[55] | Perforation (1) | 15 × 10 | ≤ 24 | Im/Tm | Endoloop | 1 | 1/1 (100%) | ND | ND | 4 wk |
| Endoclip | 4 | |||||||||
| Jung et al[63] | Perforation (1) | 25 | > 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | 12 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | ND | 2 mo |
| Endoloop | 1 | |||||||||
| Rokszin et al[47] | Perforation (1) | 5-7 | < 24 | Tp | Endoclip | 3 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 14 | 6 mo |
| Coda et al[64] | Perforation (1) | 20 (distal) | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 6 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 15 | 6 mo |
| Sato et al[24] | Perforation (1) | ND | < 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | No | ND | ND |
| Biancari et al[65] | Perforation (4) | 8 (median) | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 3/4 (75%) | Yes | 32 (median) | No |
| Huang et al[66] | Perforation (4) | ND | < 24 | ND | Endoclip | 2 | 4/4 (100%) | ND | ND | ND |
- Citation: Lázár G, Paszt A, Mán E. Role of endoscopic clipping in the treatment of oesophageal perforations. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(1): 13-22
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i1/13.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.13