Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 10, 2015; 7(6): 659-664
Published online Jun 10, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i6.659
Table 2 The comparison between "clear margin" and "unclear margin"
Clear margin (n = 289)Unclear margin (n = 75)
Age (yr)
Median ± SD70 ± 872 ± 10NS
Range37-9230-90
Sex
Men (%)237 (82.0)56 (74.7)NS
Women (%)52 (18.0)19 (25.3)
Tumor location (three parts)
U (%)54 (18.7)20 (26.7)P= 0.0128
M (%)108 (37.4)36 (48.0)
L (%)127 (43.9)19 (25.3)
Tumor location (cross-sectional parts)
Less (%)113 (39.1)27 (36.0)NS
Gre (%)47 (16.3)12 (16.0)
Ant (%)51 (17.6)13 (17.3)
Post (%)78 (27.0)23 (30.7)
Color
Reddish (%)165 (57.1)48 (64.0)P= 0.0049
Discolored (%)79 (27.3)8 (10.7)
Norm-colored (%)45 (15.6)19 (25.3)
Main macroscopic type
0-I (%)10 (3.5)1 (1.3)NS
0-IIa (%)120 (41.5)34 (45.3)
0-IIb (%)3 (1.0)3 (4.0)
0-IIc (%)156 (54.0)37 (49.3)
Components of flat area (0-IIb)
Presence (%)7 (2.4)10 (13.3)P= 0.0002
Absense (%)282 (97.6)65 (86.7)
Tumor size (mm)
Median ± SD15 ± 1125 ± 17P< 0.0001
Range2-683-100
Ulceration finding
Presence (%)43 (14.9)19 (25.3)P= 0.0319
Absense (%)246 (85.1)56 (74.7)
Components of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in the mucosal surface
Presence (%)11 (3.8)15 (20.0)P< 0.0001
Absense (%)278 (96.2)60 (80.0)
Metaplasia around the lesion
Presence (%)266 (92.0)71 (94.7)NS
Absense (%)23 (8.0)4 (5.3)