Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventional procedures

Table 4 Endoscopic ultrasound guided transluminal biliary drainage

Ref.	Number	Etiology	Technical success	Clinical success	Complication rates
Takada et al[66]	26 17 CCD, 6 HG, 2 CCA, 1 HJ	Malignant	90.6%	100%	20.7%
Kawakubo et al[67]	64 CCD: 44 HG: 20	Malignant	95%	100%	19%
Prachayakul et al[68]	21 CCD: 6 HG: 15	Malignant	95.2%	90.2%	9.5%
Hara et al[69]	18 CCD	Malignant	94%	94%	11%
Song et al[70]	15 CCD	Malignant	86.7%	100%	23.1%
Kim et al[71]	13 CCD: 9 HG: 4	Malignant	92.3%	91.7%	30.7%
Park do et al[72]	57 CCD: 26 HG: 31	Both benign and malignant	96.5%	89%	20%
Komaki et al[73]	15 CCD	Malignant	93%	100%	26.7%
Hara et al[74]	18 CCD	Malignant	94%	100%	17%
Khashab et al[64]	20 HG: 3 CCD: 15 HE: 2	Malignant	95%	86.3%	10%
Vila et al[75]	60 HG: 34 CCD: 26	Both benign and malignant	64.7% and 86.3%	63.2%	15.1%
Attasaranya et al[76]	25 HG: 16 CCD: 9	Both benign and malignant	77%	96%	35%

CCD: Cholecystoduodenostomy; HG: Hepaticogastrostomy; CCA: Cholescystoantrostomy; HJ: Hepaticojejunostomy.