Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2015; 7(5): 547-554
Published online May 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.547
Published online May 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.547
1st ERC findings | n (%) |
Number of patients | 30 |
Bile leak characteristics | |
Leak from the cystic duct stump | 13 (43.3 |
Leak from the right hepatic duct or intrahepatic duct | 12 (40.0) |
Leak from the common bile duct | 3 (10.0) |
Leak from cholecystohepatic duct of Luschka | 1 (3.3) |
Could not be located | 1 (3.3) |
CBD stone(s) | 11 (36.7) |
Endoscopic management | |
Biliary stent | 13 (43.3) |
EBS + stone extraction + biliary stent | 11 (36.7) |
EBS + biliary stent | 6 (20.0) |
Adverse effect | |
Pancreatitis | 2 (6.7) |
Bleeding | 1 (3.3) |
1st ERC leakage resolution success rate | 23/30 (76.7) |
Repeated ERC findings | |
Number of patients | 7 |
Bile leak characteristics | |
Leak from the right hepatic duct or intrahepatic duct | 6 (85.7) |
Could not be located | 1 (14.3) |
CBD stone(s) | 2 (28.6) |
Endoscopic management | |
Biliary stent | 5 (71.4) |
EBS + extraction + biliary stent | 2 (28.6) |
Adverse effect | 0 |
ERC leakage resolution success rate | 27/30 (90) |
Referred to surgery | 3 (10) |
- Citation: Ljubičić N, Bišćanin A, Pavić T, Nikolić M, Budimir I, Mijić A, Đuzel A. Biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy: Optimization of endoscopic treatment. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(5): 547-554
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i5/547.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.547