Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2015; 7(5): 540-546
Published online May 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.540
Published online May 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.540
X-Cone method(n = 100)(No.1 group) | Three-device method(n = 100)(No.2 group) | Conventional method(n = 100)(No.3 group) | P values | Statistical methodsand values | |
Operative time (min) | 56.3 ± 14.0 | 45.6 ± 12.0 | 42.1 ± 11.0 | 0.000 G1 vs G2 0.000 G1 vs G3 0.000 G2 vs G3 0.111 | One-Way |
ANOVA F = 36.86 | |||||
Blood loss1 (mL) | 16.4 ± 3.7 | 17.1 ± 4.5 | 15.8 ± 4.7 | 0.089 | One-Way ANOVA F = 2.439 |
Conversion to multiple-incision LC | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.776 | Fisher exact test |
Complications | |||||
Incision contusion | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0.543 | Fisher exact test |
Wound infection | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.625 | Fisher exact test |
Bile duct injury | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | Fisher exact test |
Bile leakage | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | Fisher exact test |
Abdominal infection | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | Fisher exact test |
Postoperative hospital stay (d) | 1.66 ± 0.5 | 1.69 ± 0.5 | 1.68 ± 0.4 | 0.928 | One-Way ANOVA F = 0.075 |
Hospital costs | 11658 ± 1435 | 10406 ± 1246 | 10036 ± 1154 | 0.000 G1 vs G2 0.000 G1 vs G3 0.000 G2 vs G3 0.415 | One-Way ANOVA F = 52.66 |
- Citation: He GL, Jiang ZS, Cheng Y, Lai QB, Zhou CJ, Liu HY, Gao Y, Pan MX, Jian ZX. Tripartite comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: A multicenter trial. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(5): 540-546
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i5/540.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.540