Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2015; 7(3): 183-191
Published online Mar 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.183
Published online Mar 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.183
Ref. | Case selection by EUS | Modality | |
+ | - | ||
Rate of perforation | |||
Takamizawa et al[8] (2002) | 0/21 (0.0%) | - | BD |
Romeo et al[85] (2011) | 15/47 (10.6%) | - | BD |
Nihoul-Fékété et al[1] (1987) | - | 6/14 (42.9%) | BD or TD |
Yeung et al[79] (1992) | - | 1/7 (14.3%) | BD or TD |
Newman et al[80] (1997) | 3/18 (16.7%) | BD | |
Kawahara et al[81] (2001) | - | 4/9 (44.4%) | BD |
Amae et al[83] (2003) | - | 1/11 (9.1%) | BD or TD |
Fan et al[104] (2011) | - | 1/8 (12.5%) | BD |
Total | 5/68 (7.4%) | 16/67 (23.9%) |
- Citation: Terui K, Saito T, Mitsunaga T, Nakata M, Yoshida H. Endoscopic management for congenital esophageal stenosis: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(3): 183-191
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i3/183.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.183