Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 25, 2015; 7(17): 1243-1249
Published online Nov 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243
Published online Nov 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243
Table 2 Comparisons of the short-term outcome
| Lap colectomy | ESD | P value | |
| OT/procedure time (min), mean ± SD | 153 ± 43 | 113 ± 66 | 0.000 |
| Post-op stay (d), median (range) | 6 (3-41) | 3 (1-13) | 0.000 |
| Days to diet, median (range) | 4 (1-13) | 2 (0-5) | 0.000 |
| Short-term complications | 13/55 (23.6%) | 7/65 (10.8%) | 0.06 |
| Pathology | Benign: 39 | Benign: 56 | 0.04 |
| T1: 16 | T1: 9 |
-
Citation: Hon SS, Ng SS, Wong TC, Chiu PW, Mak TW, Leung W, Lee JF. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(17): 1243-1249 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i17/1243.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243