Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 25, 2015; 7(17): 1243-1249
Published online Nov 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243
Published online Nov 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243
Table 1 Demographic background
| Lap colectomy | ESD | P value | |
| Number of patients | 55 | 65 | |
| Age (yr), | 64.6 ± 9.9 | 68.6 ± 9.4 | 0.03 |
| mean ± SD | |||
| Sex | Female: 27 | Female: 27 | 0.41 |
| Male: 28 | Male: 38 | ||
| ASA | < 3 vs≥ 3 : 43 vs 12 | < 3 vs≥ 3 : 48 vs 17 | 0.58 |
| Size of lesion (cm), | 3.4 ± 1.4 | 3.0 ± 1.2 | 0.07 |
| mean ± SD | |||
| Location of lesion | Colon: 52 | Colon: 59 | 0.43 |
| Rectum: 3 | Rectum: 6 |
-
Citation: Hon SS, Ng SS, Wong TC, Chiu PW, Mak TW, Leung W, Lee JF. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(17): 1243-1249 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i17/1243.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243