Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 10, 2015; 7(14): 1114-1128
Published online Oct 10, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i14.1114
Published online Oct 10, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i14.1114
Device | Mucosal incision | Submucosal dissection | Hemostasis |
FlushKnifeBT with VIO 300D (at our institution) | Endocut I, effect 2, duration 3, interval 3 | Forced coag, effect 2, 40-50 W Swift coag, effect 2, 40-50 W | Forced coag, effect 2, 40-50 W Swift coag, effect 2, 40-50 W |
with ICC 200 (at our institution) | Endocut, effect 2-3, 80-120 W | Forced coag, 40-50 W Endocut, effect 2-3, 80-120 W | Forced coag, 40-50 W |
DualKnife with VIO 300D[49] | Dry cut, effect 2, 30 W | Swift coag, effect 4, 30 W | Swift coag, effect 4, 30 W |
with ESG-100[59] | Pulse-cut-slow, 50 W | Forced coag, effect 2 | Forced coag, effect 2 |
Hemostatic forceps | |||
FD-410LR with VIO 300D[11] | Soft coag, effect 5, 50 W | ||
with ICC 200 (at our institution) | Soft coag, 80 W | ||
with ESG-100[59] | Soft coag, 80 W | ||
FD-411QR with VIO 300D (at our institution) | Soft coag, effect 6, 80-100 W |
- Citation: Yamamoto K, Michida T, Nishida T, Hayashi S, Naito M, Ito T. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Recent technical advances for safe and successful procedures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(14): 1114-1128
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i14/1114.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i14.1114